Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Aug 13, 2007, 05:50 PM // 17:50   #41
Jungle Guide
 
TheLordOfBlah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Guild: None
Profession: Mo/N
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

I doubt the people who were looking through to see who duped were told by gaile "BTW DONT BAN [X] and [Y]"

This only shows that they at least have a way of knowing who duplicated items.

I'm sure you two will get your accounts back soon enough, I wouldnt take it too hard right now considering all the crap theyre probably dealing with.
TheLordOfBlah is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 05:51 PM // 17:51   #42
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: Heroes of the Horn
Profession: A/Me
Default

It's not a case of punishing the innocent. How many people were involved in this exploit? Tens? Hundreds? Thousands? That could be millions of armbraces floating around out there. You actually think that A.Net is going to go through and check all the millions of accounts looking for who did what, manually? No, as others have suggested, they ran a script and since these two accounts had registered as doing it, they were banned. That said I'm sure they will get unbanned as soon as it's discovered what has happened.
ShadowbaneX is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 05:51 PM // 17:51   #43
Hugs and Kisses
 
[DE]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Guild: Scars Meadows
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seraphic Divinity
What are you talking about?
True dupers? Hate to break it to you, but they 'truly' duped an item.

They broke the EULA and openly admitted it to be seen as heroes who found the glitch, that's a risk they took, and now they're being punished for it. If they weren't trying to be visible heroes they could have kept it private between them and anet.

The fact remains they broke the EULA without permission and have thus received an appropriate punishment.

If you break the EULA without permission in any circumstance, you deserve to suffer the consequences. You can not -expect- anet to give them special benefits. They deserve to be banned, and if anet decides to lift the ban, then its a gift to them.


Break the EULA and suffer the consequences, justice is blind and shows no bias.
I lol'd irl.
[DE] is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 05:54 PM // 17:54   #44
Wilds Pathfinder
 
lakatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seraphic Divinity
What are you talking about?
True dupers? Hate to break it to you, but they 'truly' duped an item.

They broke the EULA and openly admitted it to be seen as heroes who found the glitch, that's a risk they took, and now they're being punished for it. If they weren't trying to be visible heroes they could have kept it private between them and anet.

The fact remains they broke the EULA without permission and have thus received an appropriate punishment.

If you break the EULA without permission in any circumstance, you deserve to suffer the consequences. You can not -expect- anet to give them special benefits. They deserve to be banned, and if anet decides to lift the ban, then its a gift to them.


Break the EULA and suffer the consequences, justice is blind and shows no bias.
I strongly suspect they aren't being punished. I suspect it was a 'flitered' ban, and they got caught in it like porpoise getting caught in a tuna net. I'm confident Gaile will attest to their dynamic duo crime-fighting efforts and free them from the tuna net.

EDIT:

Well I see Gaile posted (and so did a gazillion more people) when I was typing this and confirmed my suspicions.

ANOTHER EDIT:

I was just around looking at the bright side of this unfortunate ban on two very helpful players... at least all the people doing the duplicating of the high end stuff are banned as well.

Last edited by lakatz; Aug 13, 2007 at 06:32 PM // 18:32..
lakatz is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 05:59 PM // 17:59   #45
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Guild: Elite
Profession: R/Me
Default

More like the 27th Kanaxai as a reward... but i can see why it's happened at this point, noone was appointed to carry out such investigations, Gaile is not the programmer Etc etc...
Chaos Theory Pvp is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:02 PM // 18:02   #46
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Default

Even if it is likely that they will get unbanned, they are unfairly banned now and might be banned for several days. They would have been better of not reporting it either way.
spellsword is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:05 PM // 18:05   #47
Forge Runner
 
Bowstring Badass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Character selection screen figuring what I want to play...
Guild: Purple Lingerie - :D
Default

Banning someone for helping gg anet. Guess I know now not to report exploits being used in PvE to beat games...
Bowstring Badass is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:09 PM // 18:09   #48
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: The Black Hand Gang [BHG]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
We do not punish those who help us. We have absolutely no intention of doing so now.
But you have, as you said yourself in your post. Even if it's a temporary ban that will be resolved, it is still a punishment. Serving a day in jail and then being found innocent the next day and released is still a punishment. I understand that this was a broad sweep in order to save yourselves some hassle further down the road, but you must understand what a slap in the face even a punishment that may be resolved in an hour, tomorrow, or a few days is to people who were trying to help. You can be sure it will turn off people from helping you guys in the future, myself included. I've helped Anet with the RA exploits that occurred a long time ago. You can be assured that if I were temporarily banned for helping you guys the last place you'd ever see my IP visit is your support page.

You can tell these guys that their one day jail visit is just a vacation for the greater good. If you get them, and others to buy it, you were chosen well for your position. Underneath though, I think you can see how people outside Anet may view this in the future when an exploit is running rampant. Perhaps it would have been investigated by the community over a month ago when it was reported on the fan forums if people did not fear the repercussions. Perhaps.

Edit: And let me clarify. I don't think you guys did anything wrong. Broad sweep to minimize the problem, A.OK. But please, don't be ridiculous and try to say that these two are not being punished as a result of helping you guys.

Be honest, "Look guys, we recognize you were just helping. We recognize as a result of this you were banned. We're sorry we have to punish, even temporarily, the innocent as a result of a mistake that was purely our fault, but for the good of everyone it had to be done in this manner. We will do everything we can to unban those mistakingly punished. We apologize for this and hope that these unfortunate mistakes will not deter you from investigating and reporting exploits in the future."

Honesty and straightforwardness is the way to the heart of a community.

Last edited by TheSonofDarwin; Aug 13, 2007 at 06:56 PM // 18:56..
TheSonofDarwin is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:10 PM // 18:10   #49
Furnace Stoker
 
ShadowsRequiem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Guild: Inde is Smoking [Hawt] *ToA*
Profession: W/E
Default

hmmm I'm just wondering what happens to the people who legitly traded items for the duped armbraces?
ShadowsRequiem is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:21 PM // 18:21   #50
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: May 2007
Profession: W/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowsRequiem
hmmm I'm just wondering what happens to the people who legitly traded items for the duped armbraces?
Anet are not known for being just in their bans so they will likly see the armbraces and just ban people

GG Anet you're teaching great morals like :
if you see something bad happening, keep your head down and walk by
JeniM is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:34 PM // 18:34   #51
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: VA
Profession: Mo/
Default

thanks for the response gaile. hopefully we can get this resolved.
Enko is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:35 PM // 18:35   #52
Krytan Explorer
 
Meo Yeong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada Eh!
Guild: Test
Profession: Mo/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeniM
GG Anet you're teaching great morals like :
if you see something bad happening, keep your head down and walk by
sounds exactly the same as how they handle the bot issue and gold sellers lol
Meo Yeong is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:35 PM // 18:35   #53
Hell's Protector
 
lyra_song's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Profession: R/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeniM
Anet are not known for being just in their bans so they will likly see the armbraces and just ban people

GG Anet you're teaching great morals like :
if you see something bad happening, keep your head down and walk by
Dont make it sound like its easy to discern honest players from bad players.

This situation is like trying to stop the rain with your bare hands.

Theres a lot of innocent players who have no idea whats going on and merely buying armbraces cause they are so cheap.

----------

I have a friend who had her car fixed, and it turns out those parts were from a stolen car, which was bought unwittingly by the mechanic. After the police tracked it down, they impounded her car as evidence.

This situation sucks for everyone who is involved.
lyra_song is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:37 PM // 18:37   #54
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: Heroes of the Horn
Profession: A/Me
Default

All the A.Net hate in here is really making me sick. Some of you people really do like nothing better to kick people when they're down, don't you? There was a problem and they took steps to fix it. Some innocents got caught in those actions. This is regretable, but it had to happen. There's a loophole out there and the coders need to fix it. That means having an unthinking, scripted system in place (in addition to removing reconnects) in order to catch/prevent this from happening...otherwise they need to devote countless human resources to looking through logs of millions of accounts to find out who the offenders are. They did take the easy way (because the other way was the stupidly hard waste of time way) and in doing so did create a minor wrong. This minor wrong will be set right as soon as the problem is fixed.

But, why let that stop you. Sure just jump on the bandwagon and beat on A.Net for taking steps to solve the problem...
ShadowbaneX is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:41 PM // 18:41   #55
Elite Guru
 
yesitsrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Manchester, England
Guild: SMS/Victrix
Default

I'm going to agree with Gaile here - don't be so dumb, this is a pretty major issue, and the fastest methods to try and lock down the problem should be taken - and I would thoroughly agree that that means people who have duped and have dealt with dupers no matter how innocent they may be.

It's a pretty serious issue and it should be completely understandable that such drastic measures may have to be taken in the process of fixing it.
yesitsrob is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:52 PM // 18:52   #56
Desert Nomad
 
GloryFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Good ol' USA, where everyone else wants to be
Guild: Now Plays World of Warcraft on Whisperwind
Default

Quote:
posted by ShadowbaneX
All the A.Net hate in here is really making me sick. Some of you people really do like nothing better to kick people when they're down, don't you? There was a problem and they took steps to fix it. Some innocents got caught in those actions. This is regretable, but it had to happen. There's a loophole out there and the coders need to fix it. That means having an unthinking, scripted system in place (in addition to removing reconnects) in order to catch/prevent this from happening...otherwise they need to devote countless human resources to looking through logs of millions of accounts to find out who the offenders are. They did take the easy way (because the other way was the stupidly hard waste of time way) and in doing so did create a minor wrong. This minor wrong will be set right as soon as the problem is fixed.

But, why let that stop you. Sure just jump on the bandwagon and beat on A.Net for taking steps to solve the problem...
You have my vote for the winning post on this situation. Don't worry guys your accounts will be re activated soon enough and you got street cred from the community,,, that means something.

Meanwhile take a step back and relax a bit.
GloryFox is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:53 PM // 18:53   #57
None More Negative
 
Nurse With Wound's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Guild: Steel Phoenix [StP]
Default

Gaile you know what really happened, and who was sending you the messages about the dupe hax, early in the Euro morning. You have those, their content, and I have confidence that both Fenix and Enko will get their accounts unbanned asap, and you will take part in their unbanning. I mean you have all the proofs - they were only testing.
__________________

Gladiator's Arena > you
Nurse With Wound is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 06:53 PM // 18:53   #58
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longasc
Now I heard that Enko's account is banned. Fenix is offline, probably asleep.
They used their main account to test/find an exploit?

gg intelligence
Crotalus is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 07:07 PM // 19:07   #59
Forge Runner
 
Symeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crotalus
They used their main account to test/find an exploit?

gg intelligence
Actually, Enko did the testing on his two mule accounts, which were the ones banned. He did no testing on his main account.
Symeon is offline  
Old Aug 13, 2007, 07:10 PM // 19:10   #60
Hall Hero
 
Bryant Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

I can understand something like this happening, and yes I'd be a little ticked. What would be very concerning and annoying is if they asked "will we get banned for this"?, and the answer was "no you won't get banned for this." If that happened, yea I'd be pretty pissed. Don't know what happened, though.
Bryant Again is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:47 AM // 04:47.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("